According to Thomas Babington Lord Macaulay's History of England from the Accession of James II, which points out many otherwise impressive qualities of the Puritans, their ideology left no room for many forms of inmocent pleasure:
It was a sin to hang garlands on a Maypole, to drink a friend's health, to fly a hawk, hunt a stag, to play at chess, to wear lovelocks, to put starch into a ruff, to touch the virginals [a predecessor of the piano], to read the Fairy Queen.--Rules such as these, rules which would have appeared insupportable to the free and joyous spirit of Luther, and coutemptible to the serene and philosophical intellect of Zwingle, threw over all life a more than monastic gloom. The learning and eloqueuce by which the great reformers had been eminently distinguished, and to which they had been, in no small measure, indebted for their success, were regarded by the new school of Protestants with suspicion, if not with aversion. Some precisians had scruples about teaching the Latin grammar because the names of Mars, Bacchus, and Apollo occurred in it. The fine arts were all but proscribed. The solemn peal of the organ was superstitious. The light music of Ben Jonson's masques was dissolute. Half the fine paintings in England were idolatrous, and the other half indecent.
Puritans and Cavaliers. H. Pille. Source: Internet Archive online version of the Magazine of Art. “From the Painting by H. Pille at the salon of the Champs Élysées, Engraved by J. Bellenger.” Click on this image and those below to enlarge them.
The painting above provides a French artist’s interpretation of the two sides in the seventeenth-century English Civil War.
Related material about the Puritan Heritage in Victorian England
Three cartoons from Punch: (1) Hypocrisy denouncing music and Sunday Finery. (2) Sunday Music as Cant Would Have it. (3) Circumstances Alter Cases.
- Sabbath Observance, Sabbatarianism, and Social Class
- Sabbatarianism and the Path of a letter in Anthony Trollope's Framley Parsonage
M'Clintock, John, and James Strong. Cyclopædia of Biblical, Theological, and Ecclesiastical Literature (1880). New York: Harper & Brothers, 1894.
Last modified 22 June 2020