Conclusion

Charles Babbage

[Victorian Web Home —> Mathematics —> Relgion —> Science Texts on this site —> Next]

Credits

John van Wyhe, Ph.D., Cambridge University digitized and converted to html Charles Babbage's The Ninth Bridgewater Treatise 2nd ed. (London, 1838). George P. Landow proofed and reformatted the text and added links in December 2008.

Directions

Clicking upon the superscript numbers bring you to notes in the left — hand column; clicking upon the back button on your browser returns you to your place in the main text.

Page breaks in the original are indicated as follows: [498/499]. Where pagebreaks divide words, the complete word appears after the page break

Contents

Preface

Chapter I. Nature of the Argument

Chapter II. Argument in favour of Design from the changing of Laws in Natural Events

Chapter III. Argument to show that the Doctrines in the preceding Chapter do not lead to Fatalism

Chapter IV. On the Account of the Creation, in the First Chapter of Genesis

Chapter V. Further View of the same Subject

Chapter VI. Of the Desire of Immortality

Chapter VII. On Time

Chapter VIII. Argument from Laws intermitting—on the Nature of Miracles

Chapter IX. On the permanent Impression of our Words and Actions on the Globe we inhabit

Chapter X. On Hume's Argument against Miracles

Chapter XI. Reflections on the Inquiry in the preceding

Chapter XII. On the Nature of a Superintending Providence

Chapter XIII. A priori Argument in favour of the Occurrence of Miracles

Chapter XIV. Thoughts on the Nature of Future Punishments

Chapter XV. Reflections on Free Will

Appendix

Notes

1. See First Lecture on Political Economy. [175]

2. Sermons by the Archbishop of Dublin.

Reader, I have now fulfilled the task I undertook. Labouring under that imputed mental incapacity which the science I cultivate has been stated to produce, I have brought from the recesses of that science the reasonings and illustrations by which I have endeavoured faintly to embody the human conception of the Almighty mind. It is for you to determine whether the trains of thought I have excited have lowered or exalted your previous notions of the power and the knowledge of the Creator.[172/173]

That prejudice which I have endeavoured to expose is not a merely speculative opinion, it is a practical evil; and those whose writings have been supposed to give support to it, will, I am sure, feel grieved when they learn that it is used by the ignorant and the designing, for the injury of the virtuous and the instructed; that it is employed as a firebrand, to disturb the relations of social life. They will also, if the arguments I have used have the same effect on their minds which they have had upon my own, lament still more deeply that they should have contributed, in any degree, to throw discredit on that species of knowledge which is now found to supply some of the strongest arguments in favour of religion. I will, however, hope that the opinions I have combated are not shared or even countenanced by the higher authorities of our Protestant Church; and I cannot better conclude this Fragment, than by recalling to the reader the words of one, whose power of reasoning, and whose love of truth, add [173/174] dignity to the high station he so deservedly fills:—

"Lastly, As we must not dare to withhold or disguise revealed religious truth, so, we must dread the progress of no other truth. We must not imitate the bigoted Romanists who imprisoned Galileo; and step forward Bible in hand (like the profane Israelites carrying the Ark of God into the field of battle) to check the inquiries of the Geologist, the Astronomer, or the Political-economist, from an apprehension that the cause of religion can be endangered by them.1 Any theory on whatever subject, that is really sound, can never be inimical to a religion founded on truth; and any that is unsound may be refuted by arguments drawn from observation and experiment, without calling in the aid of revelation. If we give way to a dread of danger from the inculcation of any scriptural doctrine, or from the progress of physical or " moral science, we manifest a want of faith in " God's power, or in his will, to maintain his own cause. That we shall indeed best further his cause by fearless perseverance in an " open and straight course, I am firmly persuaded; but it is not only when we perceive the mischiefs of falsehood and disguise, and " the beneficial tendency of fairness and candour, that we are to be followers of truth: " the trial of our faith is, when we cannot perceive this: and the part of a lover of truth " is to follow her at all seeming hazards, after the example of Him who came into the world that He might bear witness to the " Truth."2



Victorian
Web

Science

Primary
Texts

Charles
Babbage

Next

13 December 2008